Hi Patrick! On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 03:47:08PM +0200, Patrick Franz wrote: > > - In debian/qmake6.links, the comment should probably be qmake -> > > qmake6, not vice versa. > > We were talking about this and wondered: Do we want people to use qmake > or qmake6 ? If we want them to use qmake6, we'll keep that file and link > qmake to it.
I would prefer people to use qmake6. But what I meant here is that the comment doesn't match the actual code. debian/*.links syntax is "source destination", and it creates a file named "destination" as a link to a file named "source". If you run ls -l, it will show it in format "destination -> source". I suggested to use the same in the comment, which will be "qmake -> qmake6". > I just ran a testbuild of 6.2.0-rc2 and it builds without problems. Of > course, the installed files still need to be sorted out and symbols need > to be updated. > Seeing that 6.2.0 final is planned to be released on Thursday, I think we > can squeeze 6.2.0 in. It should make packaging the other submodules > easier, since we can jump to 6.2 instead of having to remain on 6.1. Great! In symbols, please use directly 6.2.0 instead of 6.2.0~rc2, because it's very unlikely that ABI will change before final release. -- Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
