Hi, Alle giovedì 03 luglio 2008, Modestas Vainius ha scritto: > Thursday 03 July 2008, Ana Guerrero rašė: > > I do not care at all about using +++ Name or [ Name ] but when more than > > a person have worked in the package I like uploading it as a team upload > > as we have done until now. So not ok about changing that.
Fully agree with this; as long as there's something "coherent" with the majority of ther packages in Debian, that's fine. > 2) Now the second maintainer committing changes has to: > a) add +++ Changes by line for the first maintainer, which effectively > means copy&pasting from the changelog maintainer field if 1st maitainer > created a personal entry. A bit time consuming. > b) add "+++ Changes for My name". Pretty easy. > c) replace current changelog maintainer with Debian QT/KDE Maintainers. Another (minor) disadvantage of changing "non-named" entries to "named" ones is reindenting the entries: not for the "hassle" of doing that, but also for the slightly "tampering" of the VCS "blame" feature. > 2) Do not change anything until "team name in the changelog maintainer" is > implemented in dch (Ana's wish). My vote would go to this... > 3) Disallow non-team name & address in the changelog mainainer field, hence > everybody adds their own "+++ Changes by name". I can write svn hook which > would enforce this rule. This will ensure that dch -m will always work > properly for creating new changelog entries. ... but this proposal is basically b), just done manually, so +1 on this, too. And, as long as a dch-like format is used, this should not be incompatible with b), I think. We are a team, so let's act as team! :) -- Pino Toscano
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.