On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:21:12PM +0000, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:44:23PM +0000, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On 2008-07-19, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > -okular, the new KDE 4 document viewer. (source split from KDE 4's 
> > > > kdegraphics)
> > > 
> > > Is it indended to replace or accompany kpdf for Lenny?
> > 
> >   I hope not, okular isn't a decent replacement for kpdf for me yet.
> seriuosly? first time I have read somebody prefer kpdf over okular.

  + navigation of hyperlinks is badly broken (doesn't jump in the proper
    places e.g.);
  + I *hate* the left widget with silly icons that eat horizontal space
    for no good reason, and miss the previous "sliding" widget that
    implemented the very same in kpdf, and it's a big no-go for me, I've
    a small screen on my laptop ;
  + there are quite a few annoying glitches with the thumbnail
    navigation too, I don't recall which though.

  And there are quite a few quirks that are irritating beyond words,
when you work with huge PDFs files (lots of norms, POSIX documentation,
and whatnot) on a hourly basis.

  Kpdf may lack a few fancy thingies, but the UI is overall more
polished. Like we say in france, the devil is in the details. okular is
gross compared to what kpdf does for now.

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpE0WM18VHnE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply via email to