On Thursday 09 April 2009 00:26:02 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Thursday 09 April 2009 00:49:07 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > What should be KDE?
> > The thing that upstream ships as KDE?
> I think the "kde" package should be strongly related to what upstream
> when they say "new KDE version released". That is the rule for pretty
> all other packages, after all.
> Variations should then be kde-$something, again, same as other
> > The thing that Developer A and Developer B has agreed upon?
> > The thing that Developer C and Developer D has agreed upon?
> > Whan when users wants more?
> Heh, what about a kde-80-20 package that installs the 20% most popular
> related packages based on popcon, which should then be enough for
> users. ;-)
One of the 20% of most popular KDE packages would probably be kde-full
since most users would probably just want the most complete experience.
Anyway, I think you should do what the Gnome team does, which is have a
kde-desktop-environment package, which is what you think the base KDE is,
and a kde package, containing all that upstream ships as KDE.