On Thursday 09 April 2009 00:26:02 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Thursday 09 April 2009 00:49:07 Sune Vuorela wrote: > > What should be KDE? > > > > The thing that upstream ships as KDE? > > I think the "kde" package should be strongly related to what upstream ships > when they say "new KDE version released". That is the rule for pretty much > all other packages, after all. > > Variations should then be kde-$something, again, same as other packages. > > > The thing that Developer A and Developer B has agreed upon? > > The thing that Developer C and Developer D has agreed upon? > > Whan when users wants more? > > Heh, what about a kde-80-20 package that installs the 20% most popular KDE- > related packages based on popcon, which should then be enough for 80% of > users. ;-) > > > -- > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk One of the 20% of most popular KDE packages would probably be kde-full since most users would probably just want the most complete experience.
Anyway, I think you should do what the Gnome team does, which is have a kde-desktop-environment package, which is what you think the base KDE is, and a kde package, containing all that upstream ships as KDE. -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk