Hello, On trečiadienis 25 Lapkritis 2009 18:25:28 Scott Kitterman wrote: > Our thought is to not split Plasma Desktop out into a separate binary, but > leave it in kdebase-workspace as something that should always be installed > (somewhat as a fallback) even if it's not started by default on some > devices.
Why? > Then additional plasmas (Plasma Netbook for KDE SC 4.4) would be > in separate binaries so they would only be installed on devices > appropriate for the specialized plasma. The files built from: > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/netbook/ > > would all go in a plasma-netbook package built from the kdebase-workspace > source. plasma-netbook package makes sense. > > This approach seems reasonably scalable and future proof and also minimizes > the amount of code installed on most systems. It might be scalable, but it does not minimize amount of code installed. plasma-desktop is still uselessly installed where otherwise it is not needed. Anyway, more justification on technical grounds please. -- Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.