Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet.  The
question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming.

Jonathan


On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote:

> I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here.
>
> Scott K
>
> On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a
> FFe
> > and any testers very welcome
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349
> > ppa:jr/ppa  install kdeconnect-plasma5
> >
> > Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to
> > release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5.  The naming is
> > inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just
> > kdeconnect.  What should I name the plasma 5 version?  It does overlap
> and
> > replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a
> > different tar upstream.
> >
> > Jonathan
>
>
> --
> kubuntu-devel mailing list
> kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
>
-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Reply via email to