On Monday 20 April 2015 18:41:26 Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I
> have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just
> switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period?

The best thing to do is, if possible, provide a Qt4 and a Qt5 version.

If you do a direct change then all the apps that currently build depend on 
your library but can't switch now to Qt5 will have problems.

> The second question is the problem with armel and armhf
> qt5-builds. I think it will cause some problems [1] and would
> like to ask for a solution, which should be applied for all affected
> packages.
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2015/03/msg00233.html

Same as Sune already said: either get the code ported to another thing (GLU 
doesn not runs using opengl es) or disable those archs.


-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Reply via email to