On Monday 20 April 2015 23:23:13 Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Friday, 2014-10-10, 00:19:51, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > So my *personal* plan for Jessie+1 is this: not loose a single second on > > QtWebEngine. > > > > Of course I won't stop anyone in trying to ship it. But if no one steps up > > to maintain it I will not hesitate in simply ignoring it as much as > > possible, even at the point of not shipping stuff that depends on it. > > Since this is the web engine of Qt, is then plan not to ship Qt at all or > not to ship this specific module?
The plan is not to ship it as long as nobody packages it. But for somebody to package it he will *really* need time and packaging skills. And if he is not a DD he will need one with also quite a lot of time to review and sponsor the upload. > Assuming the latter, wouldn't that mean that each application will have to > ship its locally bundled version, resulting in dozends or hundrets of per- > package copies of the module of significant size? The packaging problem remains the same so it means that those apps will either need a way to not use it's functionality or not be shipped at all. -- Some consider UNIX to be the second most important invention to come out of AT&T Bell Labs after the transistor. Dennis Ritchie, creator of the C programming language and co-creator of UNIX http://www.linfo.org/q_unix.html Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk