On Thursday 20 August 2015 22:50:39 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
[snip] 
> > Matthias: is there any chance to make this simbol part of the new ABI? In
> > this way stuff will not migrate to testing as it happened for us.
> 
> std::function seems to be a header only thing, so there is no related symbol
> in libstdc++6.

A template, I should have checked that before :-/ Thanks for the heads-up!

> >> According to Matthias Klose, upstream actually gives no guarantees for
> >> for
> >> their abi for c++11, so I guess the steps forward should be:
> >> 
> >> 1) Immediately binNMU src:kdecoration2 in testing, then when that is
> >> done,
> >> binNMU src:kwin, src:oxygen and src:breeze all in testing. (that's for
> >> release team)
> > 
> > I don't know if we can binNMU something in testing with a testing chroot.
> > I
> > think it needs a sourcefull upload to t-p-u. RT, please confirm.
> 
> The release team asked us to do this after having a newer version in
> unstable blocked by a transition. So we need to request the binNMU after
> 2).

ACK.

> >> 2) At the same time, do a library transition for libkdecoration2-5 and
> >> rename it to libkdecoration2-5v5 and binNMU the rdeps (the same as
> >> mentioned above)
> > 
> > I can do this if the RT ACKs it (all B-Ds are ready).
> 
> I'm preparing this upload.

Excellent! Ping me if I can be of further help.

-- 

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Reply via email to