On Thursday 20 August 2015 22:50:39 Maximiliano Curia wrote: [snip] > > Matthias: is there any chance to make this simbol part of the new ABI? In > > this way stuff will not migrate to testing as it happened for us. > > std::function seems to be a header only thing, so there is no related symbol > in libstdc++6.
A template, I should have checked that before :-/ Thanks for the heads-up! > >> According to Matthias Klose, upstream actually gives no guarantees for > >> for > >> their abi for c++11, so I guess the steps forward should be: > >> > >> 1) Immediately binNMU src:kdecoration2 in testing, then when that is > >> done, > >> binNMU src:kwin, src:oxygen and src:breeze all in testing. (that's for > >> release team) > > > > I don't know if we can binNMU something in testing with a testing chroot. > > I > > think it needs a sourcefull upload to t-p-u. RT, please confirm. > > The release team asked us to do this after having a newer version in > unstable blocked by a transition. So we need to request the binNMU after > 2). ACK. > >> 2) At the same time, do a library transition for libkdecoration2-5 and > >> rename it to libkdecoration2-5v5 and binNMU the rdeps (the same as > >> mentioned above) > > > > I can do this if the RT ACKs it (all B-Ds are ready). > > I'm preparing this upload. Excellent! Ping me if I can be of further help. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.