On Saturday 22 August 2015 11:48:47 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Yves-Alexis, > > On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:04:21 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > I somehow missed this bug. I'm a bit unsure what to do with those > > symbols updates. I guess it's related to some libstdc++ change but I'm > > unsure what that really means for me. Should I just update the symbols > > files here? (I'm really not fluent in Qt or C++ so really any help > > appreciated here). > > All symbols that are removed in the diff are destructors for Qt classes that > are not part of Qt's own ABI (i.e. declared inline or template > instantiations). > > These symbols are not exposed to users of your library and can be safely > removed from the symbols file. > > You usually only need to worry if the symbols diff contains "__cxx11", in > this case there are no symbols containing this so you are safe.
Just to be more precise: s/usually/for this transition/ After this transition happens then normal rules apply. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk