On Saturday 22 August 2015 11:48:47 Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Yves-Alexis,
> On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:04:21 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > I somehow missed this bug. I'm a bit unsure what to do with those
> > symbols updates. I guess it's related to some libstdc++ change but I'm
> > unsure what that really means for me. Should I just update the symbols
> > files here? (I'm really not fluent in Qt or C++ so really any help
> > appreciated here).
> All symbols that are removed in the diff are destructors for Qt classes that
> are not part of Qt's own ABI (i.e. declared inline or template
> instantiations).
> These symbols are not exposed to users of your library and can be safely
> removed from the symbols file.
> You usually only need to worry if the symbols diff contains "__cxx11", in
> this case there are no symbols containing this so you are safe.

Just to be more precise: s/usually/for this transition/

After this transition happens then normal rules apply.


Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply via email to