On 2015-09-14 17:54, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 14/09/15 17:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> On Monday 14 September 2015 10:12:40 Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=postbooks tells
>>> me that my package didn't migrate to testing because "libqt4-webkit is
>>> not available in Debian"
>>> I unpacked the binary package[1] with "dpkg -e ..." and looking inside
>>> the control file, libqt4-webkit is not mentioned anywhere.  It only
>>> depends on libqtwebkit4 (>= 2.1.0~2011week13)
>>> The source package has a build dependency on libqtwebkit-dev
>>> Furthermore, the update_excuses page[2] doesn't mention libqt-webkit4 at
>>> all.
>>> Is there some special logic around the migration of qtwebkit reverse
>>> dependencies now?  Or is there some bug in the migration process?
>> Nothing strange on our side, I would ask the Release Team about this :-/
> Can anybody in the release team comment on this?
> [...]

I have no clue why testing.pl concludes that postbooks depends on
libqt4-webkit.  However, that is a red herring. Sadly, it is not the
most reliable/accurate service.

The issue is that migrating postbooks would make postbooks-updater
uninstallable on amd64.  I have tried to add an easy hint to make
Britney migrate postbooks together with postbooks-updater (without
having checked if it will work).
  If it does not migrate tonight, we will revisit it.  Please note that
the migration mails are set only once a day (next in 22 hours from now),
so please use dak or rmadision if you want to know before then.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply via email to