On Saturday 14 November 2015 18:49:13 Samuel Thibault wrote: > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, on Sat 14 Nov 2015 14:28:53 -0300, wrote: [snip] > > As long as it depends on kde stuff I can only put it on Suggest (which I > > did) on libqtcore4. Any higher dependency would make normal installations > > pull KDE stuff by default, which is definitely not good. > > Err, only libkdecore5 and a couple of qt libraries: libqt4-dbus (already > needed for qt-at-spi), libqt4-network. Is that *really* a problem? We're > here talking about a bunch of MiB used on the disk.
Yes it is. Inflicting KDE stuff to pure-qt users is something we really want to avoid. Believe me we would get bugs for it as soon as we push it. On Saturday 14 November 2015 19:25:03 Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Sat 14 Nov 2015 19:09:54 +0100, wrote: > > So I guess I'll just drop that support, thus releaving qt-at-spi from > > the libkdecore5 dependency. > > Done so in the 0.4.0-3 version. Fabulous! Just to get things in the best possible way: is qt-at-spi usefull without a GUI? I'm asking because if it isn't it's just better to add it as a libqtgui4 recommendations instead. As an example, a daemon written with libqtcore4 shouldn't get GUI stuff. -- No pienses que estoy loco, es sólo una manera de actuar De mí - Charly García Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.