On Saturday 14 November 2015 18:49:13 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer, on Sat 14 Nov 2015 14:28:53 -0300, 
> > As long as it depends on kde stuff I can only put it on Suggest (which I
> > did) on libqtcore4. Any higher dependency would make normal installations
> > pull KDE stuff by default, which is definitely not good.
> Err, only libkdecore5 and a couple of qt libraries: libqt4-dbus (already
> needed for qt-at-spi), libqt4-network. Is that *really* a problem? We're
> here talking about a bunch of MiB used on the disk.

Yes it is. Inflicting KDE stuff to pure-qt users is something we really want 
to avoid. Believe me we would get bugs for it as soon as we push it.

On Saturday 14 November 2015 19:25:03 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Sat 14 Nov 2015 19:09:54 +0100, wrote:
> > So I guess I'll just drop that support, thus releaving qt-at-spi from
> > the libkdecore5 dependency.
> Done so in the 0.4.0-3 version.


Just to get things in the best possible way: is qt-at-spi usefull without a 
GUI? I'm asking because if it isn't it's just better to add it as a libqtgui4 
recommendations instead. As an example, a daemon written with libqtcore4 
shouldn't get GUI stuff.

No pienses que estoy loco, es sólo una manera de actuar
  De mí - Charly García

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply via email to