On Monday 21 December 2015 23:38:41 Scott Kitterman wrote: [snip] > > > >I think this is overcautious. Qt 4 is to be removed from Debian so > >removing dependencies on Qt 4 is preferred to adding new ones. > > Digikam is notoriously difficult to package before final release due to > depending on unreleased library versions and/or embedded code copies. Not > packaging pre-release versions of Digikam is an eminently reasonable thing > to do. This is particularly true right now when no one else was working on > it at all AFAICT.
+1 > It's not entirely clear is we'll succeed in getting entirely rid of Qt4 this > cycle. The thing we know for sure is going away is QtWebKit for Qt4. Qt4 will bee too difficult, qt4's webkit has to go. -- Simulations are like miniskirts, they show a lot and hide the essentials. Hubert Kirrman Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.