On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 02:57:50PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 03:41:39PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
> wrote:
> >> In any case I think we should keep the logic in pkg-kde-tools package, i.e.
> >> replace the existing script with mine or extend its logic. I hope Python
> >> dependency is not a problem, is it?
> >
> > I'm totally for it. If it becomes a problem for someone we can consider
> > generating a new binary package from the same source and adding the python
> > dependency there. We might even do that from the beginning.
> 
> Maybe we should actually rewrite it in Perl or shell. (Any volunteers? :))

AFAIK, this is only to check symbols at build time? So Build-Depends
on python (or python-minimal) and no additional runtime depends. There
is no use creating work where none is required, especially if we
already have the most readable language out of the three :D

- Adam


-- 
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Reply via email to