On Monday 28 December 2015 15:07:12 Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:08:45PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > DigiKam itself currently uses (Qt4-version) libqtwebkit-dev.  I saw the
> > bug
> > about it and the web page https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4WebKitRemoval
> > What I haven't seen is a precise time for this.  The schedule for Digikam
> > 5
> > release is May, so I (hopefully) won't need to care after that.  Is the
> > webkit going to be removed before next May?
> 
> Actually I would like it to be removed before May. I am going to bump bugs
> severities to important soon (in January) and make them RC a couple of
> months after that (i.e. in March) to get the packages removed from testing
> (or fixed).
> 
> I am also going to remove the PyQt5 QtWebKit bindings very soon (in a couple
> of weeks).
> 
> So maybe it's not the best idea to introduce a new package using QtWebKit.
> 
> Lisandro, you did not reply to this part of Steve's message, what do you
> think?

We need a kf5-based kdepim in unstable first. I was told that current packages 
in experimental are not ready for unstable yet.

-- 
When the winds of change are blowing, some people are building shelters, and
others are building windmills.
  Old Chinese Proverb

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Reply via email to