On Thursday 07 January 2016 21:18:16 Pino Toscano wrote: > In data giovedì 7 gennaio 2016 22:49:24, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: > > Hi Pino, > > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:19:03PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > @Qt_5 symbols need to require version >= 5.6.0~beta, then: if not, the > > > version filled in packages is not enough, causing runtime failures like > > > the one you pasted above. > > > > You mean I should bump the symbols versions, right? > > Yes.
Dmitry went this way already, so things should work now. Thanks Pino for helping us with this :) Now on a different but related matter we still had doubts on why applications built with Qt 5.5 would work with Qt 5.6 even if the version nodes changed. As described in : "When the linker finds a symbol defined in a library which is not specifically bound to a version node, it will effectively bind it to an unspecified base version of the library." So basically ld will link any app depending on the @Base version node to a lib that fullfils the symbol no matter it's version node, thus apps compiled against Qt << 5.6 will still work with Qt >= 5.6.  <https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/VERSION.html> All in all it was a very good idea to start packaging 5.6 during it's beta. Thanks everyone! -- Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. -- Groucho Marx Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.