Hi Sandro!

On Sunday 24 January 2016 03:22:47 Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
> > And now that the facts are on the table I will give you my personal
> > opinion: even if lots of important apps depend on it I would remove it at
> > least from testing.
> I can understand your option and also think this is okay, but I would like
> to get a exception for kdepim/kdepim-runtime.
> Mails are very important for users, so removing it from testing would make
> it impossible for testing users to read their mails.

On the same base that mails are important for users, should we ship something 
that might be security-compromised and with no upstream support for something 
so important as mails?

And mails fall exactly in the category of "app that handles unstrusted data" 
I'm afraid :-/

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply via email to