On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:36:20AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > El martes, 13 de febrero de 2018 21:25:59 -03 Olzhas Rakhimov escribió: > > Hello All, > > > > I was wondering if Verdigris would be suitable for this team. > > Here's RFP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886514 > > > > It has just reached 1.0, > > and I am thinking about Debian packaging. > > Your team and sponsorship would be very helpful. > > What would we gain from using it? >
The major points for me from replacing Qt moc w/ Verdigris: 0. Works w/ modern C++ code (templates, nested classes) 1. Compilation time improvement (easy parallel builds, native compiler vs. moc) 2. One less headache dealing w/ custom code generator (i.e., moc) (e.g, moc pre-5.9 cannot handle some C++17 syntax) It is likely that Verdigris will be forward-compatible and could evolve w/ C++20 features (meta-classes, compile-time introspection), while the Qt moc will always remain a laggard. Regards, Olzhas -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk