On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:17PM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> this is not that bad than it sounds as lustre is a very very specific
> kind of software, which is rarely/not at all used by normal users. 


I don't think this is RC from a FTBFS point of view, but I'm not
entirely sure about if it would be policy compliant. The simplest way of
fixing this would be to move it from main to contrib - would you be
willing to do this as maintainer?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to