On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:48:55PM -0400, John Morrissey wrote:
> > Bastian, I'm happy to help, so please let me know if there's anything I can
> > do.
> As the lustre client support in 3.16 is broken, could you review the
> changes in 3.17 and see if a backport looks reasonable?

It seems the client is broken on systems with more than one CPU, which I
kludged around with 'cpu_npartitions=1' - is that the breakage you're
talking about? I haven't had a chance to look at or try 3.17 yet.

> Also a test setup with some rhel/centos 6 server would be helpful.

Will do. I'm actually working with Intel to do some benchmarking with their
Amazon Web Services offering for Lustre, which runs CentOS 6 on the server.


Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to