2010/12/10 Walter Landry <wlan...@caltech.edu>:
> Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
>>> To start with, the goal is to avoid any confusion around what is and
>>> what is not MeeGo. Anything that is or will become associated with
>>> the MeeGo trademark has to be in conformance with the compliance
>>> program.
>>
>> Unfortunately, there's no way that Debian can possibly comply with the
>> compliance specification as written. [I only got as far as §2.3 to
>> find an obvious deal-breaker.]
>>
>> This sounds like yet another case where an unbranded name[1] is
>> required for actual use in the community, ala iceweasel.
>
> Iigo?  Weego? (maybe too similar)  Yoogo?  Allgo?
>

Perhaps FreeGo would be a nice option.

/Magnus

_______________________________________________
Pkg-meego-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-meego-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-meego-maintainers

Reply via email to