> Julian wrote:
> > * Package names contain meego everywhere. According to common
> > believe, they are not subject to trademark restrictions (that's
> > why we had a firefox compatibility package for
> > firefox->iceweasel transition). They are merely an
> > implementation detail, that MeeGo set in stone, and we cannot
> > change it without breaking compatibility
> As said, as long as you respect the license of the package you are
> free to reuse, redistribute, etc, keeping the original name of the
Assuming you mean "copyright license of the package" and not the
trademark licensing under discussion, then I think that would be fine.
Could http://meego.com/trademark be updated to remove the "includes
project packages" wording, please?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Pkg-meego-maintainers mailing list