MJ Ray wrote:
> > As said, as long as you respect the license of the package you are
> > free to reuse, redistribute, etc, keeping the original name of the
> > package.
> Assuming you mean "copyright license of the package" and not the
> trademark licensing under discussion, then I think that would be fine.
> Could http://meego.com/trademark be updated to remove the "includes
> project packages" wording, please?
More detail needed defining cases where using "meego" in package names is OK
Pkg-meego-maintainers mailing list