MJ Ray wrote:

> > As said, as long as you respect the license of the package you are
> > free to reuse, redistribute, etc, keeping the original name of the
> > package.
>
> Assuming you mean "copyright license of the package" and not the
> trademark licensing under discussion, then I think that would be fine.
> Could http://meego.com/trademark be updated to remove the "includes
> project packages" wording, please?

Requested:

More detail needed defining cases where using "meego" in package names is OK
http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11500

--
Quim

_______________________________________________
Pkg-meego-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-meego-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-meego-maintainers

Reply via email to