On Feb 21, 2011, at 13:02, Loïc Minier wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
>> Difficult to give many particulars as there are usually NDAs and other
>> restrictions against naming specific projects and companies. I can say
>> that there is definitely activity around the OMAP 4, Exynos, and Tegra
>> 2. More than that I really don't know.
> 
> Are these going to be submarine projects for a long period, or will
> these companies "soon" step up publicly to back meego up?  More public
> love would be good  :-)

Yeah, a little more public love would be pretty good right now. :-)

Unfortunately we'll have to wait for the dust to settle a little bit. Intel is 
not going to back away from MeeGo that is for sure, and other companies are 
getting more active. Hopefully we can push more information out into the public 
and that is definitely an important benchmark for the project.

Regards,

Jeremiah
_______________________________________________
Pkg-meego-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-meego-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-meego-maintainers

Reply via email to