-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi release team,
Le 12/02/2014 16:28, David Prévot a écrit : > I’m sorry to ask for such a request again, but it seems like the less > ugly way to handle the new ESR-support of iceweasel in stable… AFAICT, there has not been any feedback about such update for mozilla-extension (including #739069 for sage-extension and #739075 for flashblock), so I’m not sure how to handle the few other RC bugs affecting stable only (#740539 for mozilla-noscript and #739023 for greasemonkey) that may fall under the same conditions. - - Should I open the same kind of release.d.o ticket? - - Would you prefer another approach? > I’m happy to keep the 1.12.6-1 in Sid and Jessie as long as needed to > hopefully get as much testing as possible with the current iceweasel 24 While I’ve actually been packaging 1.13 alpha releases to experimental, I wonder if I should stick to 1.12.6 in Sid (while 1.12.7 “represents a maintenance release fixing […] compatibility issues with upcoming Firefox versions”[1]). In other words: - - what is your take in keeping 1.12.6-1 in Sid? - - Would you mind if we were to update this pu request about 1.12.7-1~deb7u1? 1: https://blog.getfirebug.com/2014/03/05/firebug-1-12-7/ Regards David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTKhCgAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08e2kIAIn1coI4tDqC5M2MZehBNRa6 2J73EmitOvl5hcZdR9pmKGSTXNSPOcpwT79N1bcaLgKB+ZqrFQsXQ7lUhNglI1L6 /ywXAxv+SXfYR1oPY8c9HXsSh2QC6fAgLNbkHhWYrExGqqrLj2Sxj8CltWaMtqsm 3+Icna25uVR6FQ1th5sTpJxVUM/PU3LpgEwSzcxIPOpCoMJbWa5fC6kX9wgGknRQ LAaJpJPmoq5eZxqbBfEuFVfJcUYy2drYHGjdPuZSFME3U/FlmNehZe6p/y2Je/Oq /2bu7/fIiJ6642WjVVqt048+YwBFxrgabP3mG0qTzX+CPy3TcHClP58xY8dwYLY= =IGko -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers