On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:47:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not
> to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package,
> and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are
> things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps
> would need.
Wait. You upload something known-broken to unstable? Why on earth
didn't you ask people to test on experimental first?
> This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your
> packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about?
> Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd
(Maybe not a bad move of LO to remove all NPAPI support.)
> I *will* eventually get to doing the research myself, but it would
> really be helpful if you could beat me to it :)
It would really be helpful not to break unstable like that.
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list