Hey Ondřej, * Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> [2014-07-22 02:42:03 +0200]:
> I just found the upstream misses OpenSSL exception, so I will > have to sort it out together with next stable upstream release. > > 1. Do we already have some nice *SSL boilerplate exception that > would allow OpenSSL derivative libraries as well? Joey Hess quoted the FSF boilerplate in . In can be found in at least wget and GnuPG. In full: | In addition, as a special exception, <copyright holder> gives permission to | link the code of <project> with the OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" library (or | with modified versions of it that use the same license as the "OpenSSL" | library), and distribute the linked executables. You must obey the GNU General | Public License in all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL". | If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to your version of the | file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete | this exception statement from your version.  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg00564.html HTH, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #390: Increased sunspot activity.
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers