Yes, as I consulted that section in Policy, I CC'd all of these messages to pkg-mozilla-maintainers list. I haven't received any response about it yet.
Explaining the topic here again: * firefox-branding-iceweasel (Binary: xul-ext-iceweasel-branding), the package to restore Iceweasel experience, did not provide a correctly branded desktop icon as of the version 0.2.3 (now in testing). * I've written a new version that substitutes the two .desktop files from firefox(-esr) with Iceweasel ones to complete the rebranding, using dpkg-divert. * Since the use of dpkg-divert requires attention from the affected maintainers, I'd like Mozilla packages maintainers to check the package. Any piece of advice is welcome. Git repository at pkg-mozext: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-mozext/iceweasel-branding.git/ I intend to submit this for stable-release-update. Thanks, nord-stream On 19/06/16 06:42, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello again nord-stream, > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:27:28AM +0000, nord-stream wrote: >> I've implemented dpkg-divert scripts and Iceweasel desktop icon works >> beautifully for me with this change. >> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-mozext/iceweasel-branding.git/ > > I just checked the Debian Policy Manual on dpkg-divert. It says "You > should not use `dpkg-divert' on a file belonging to another package > without consulting the maintainer of that package first." Have you done > this? >
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers