On 2016-11-09 18:44, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:14:45PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
If users of testing or unstable have the malware installed now and
the package gets removed from the archive, users are left with the
malware, right?


yes

That's why I thought about uploading an empty package to unstable,

yes, of course.

Whilst that's in progress, let's at least limit damage through new installations:

jmw@respighi:~$ head -n 3 hints/jmw
# 20161109
# #842939 damage limitation
remove wot/20151208-2

A 'fixed' package can still migrate later.


it should be released with stretch, but can be safely removed later.

i'm not sure about the releasing with stretch part. Maybe it would be
better to have the updated, empty package in stretch in 5plusX days and
then remove it before the release, say on January 1st.

Let's not actually release it, but a leaf package like this is trivially removed again.

(Strictly speaking use of Stretch is still 'at own risk' and unsupported, so this is overkill, but it's small effort to be nice.)

--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      j...@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
                        layered on top of bonghits

_______________________________________________
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-mozext-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers

Reply via email to