On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote: > firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it > ever will be (see #817954). > > firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla maintainers > (Cc'ed on this bug) should be able to give a more definite answer > on that.
What exactly am I expected to do about this bug?? If "firefox-dev" is not meant to be in Stretch than it should have "serious" bug instead of packages that depend on "firefox-dev". Should I just replace "firefox-dev" with "firefox-esr-dev"? How are they different? Thanks. -- Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/52B6BBD953968D1B --- Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfils the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things. -- Winston Churchill
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mozext-maintainers