On 02.04.19 00:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2019-04-01 20:42:20, Joachim Bauch wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> Am 01.04.19 um 20:10 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: >>> On 2019-03-15 11:27:35, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >>>> On 2019-03-15 11:22:01, Joachim Bauch wrote: >>>>> On 27.02.19 15:52, Joachim Bauch wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> there is a new release of libheif for which I just updated the packaging >>>>>> on Salsa (not tagged as Debian package release yet): >>>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/libheif >>>>>> >>>>>> For reference, the source package is available at >>>>>> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_1.4.0-1.dsc >>> >>> lintian reports: >>> >>> W: heif-gdk-pixbuf: package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger >>> >>> Question is: why does the loader have a SONAME? It isn't a shared >>> library. >> >> yeah, I also noticed this and already fixed it upstream [1], however >> this will only be in the next release. I could however backport the >> change as patch if you already want to have it in the package for the >> current version. > > Yes, please backport the patch. Since we're in freeze, please also > target experimental.
Done, the changes are committed to salsa and the new source package is ready for review on mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libheif/libheif_1.4.0-1.dsc What is the process to get the package back in unstable again? On https://wiki.debian.org/DebianExperimental I only found "The migration of packages from experimental to unstable is entirely at discretion of the packagers". Thanks, Joachim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
