Od: Free Ekanayaka <fr...@debian.org> JM> Just one other concern ... Should be jconv renamed to jconvolver to not be JM> confusing? JM> If so how to do it?
FE> Unless there's a very compelling reason for doing so, I'd rather not FE> because that would probably require to provide transitional dummy FE> packages (okay, the package was not in Lenny, so this is not FE> super-critical, but still nice to do). Hi, There was a typo in my post... correction... "Should be jconv repo renamed ..." oh.. package is already renamed to jconvolver ... I didn't realize that it brings such difficulties. I asked on ML what I should be aware if I consider rename package... no answer... so I thought it is not problematic what now? regards mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers