On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 16:42, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:12:03PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 15:22:01 (CEST), j...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >> >>> The following commit has been merged in the master.jackd2 branch: >>> commit b24e80575850b4cd75c60550c52da99f3dab83e5 >>> Author: Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> >>> Date: Thu Apr 1 15:09:44 2010 +0200 >>> >>> Use source format "3.0 (quilt)" (not CDBS simple-patchsys.mk). >> >> I think the current consensus is to avoid format "3.0 (quilt)" until >> support for VCS and helper tools like git-buildpackage improves. >> >> See e.g. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572204 for an >> elaborate description of this. >> >> Until we have a clear idea on how format 3.0 (quilt) should be used with >> git-buildpackage, I'd suggest to revert this change. > > Current consensus where? In the Multimedia team?
Yeap. See the log of the first IRC meeting. > > I fail to understand how a wishlist issue like bug#572204 should stop us > from using the new source format. > > If anyone is confused about how the new format works and can integrate most > elegantly with our packaging style (which is similar but not entirely the > same as the preferred one of Colin Watson) then let's discuss it - I believe > I have found a useful set of routines, which could be put into > README.source. I think the main issue is working with applied patches _and_ a debian/patches dir... If one does not use --export-dir git-buildpackage fails miserably. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers