On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 14:58, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 16:36:12 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>>>> Until we have a clear idea on how format 3.0 (quilt) should be used with
>>>> git-buildpackage, I'd suggest to revert this change.
>>>
>>> Current consensus where? In the Multimedia team?
>>
>> Yeap. See the log of the first IRC meeting.
>>
>>>
>>> I fail to understand how a wishlist issue like bug#572204 should stop us
>>> from using the new source format.
>>>
>>> If anyone is confused about how the new format works and can integrate most
>>> elegantly with our packaging style (which is similar but not entirely the
>>> same as the preferred one of Colin Watson) then let's discuss it - I believe
>>> I have found a useful set of routines, which could be put into
>>> README.source.
>>
>> I think the main issue is working with applied patches _and_ a
>> debian/patches dir...
>
> exactly.
>
>> If one does not use --export-dir git-buildpackage fails miserably.
>
> I've never used that option, but after reading git-buildpackage(1), I'm
> not sure if this helps.

If you do not have the patches applied, it works. I have been working
like this for the csound package.

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to