On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 19:24:23 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: >> For C++ libraries, I don't see any point in using symbol files until >> dpkg-gensyms understands unmangled symbols. Working on demangled symbol >> is just too painful IMO. > > According to bug #563752, dpkg-gensyms understands them.
yes, these changes look very promising, but are not in unstable (yet), and won't make it into ubuntu lucid :-( >>> And yes, if you coding experts (compared to me) consider the symbol >>> differences between 1.1.x and 1.9.x not worrying, then I will proceed >>> with releasing the current packaging, and postpone polishing the symbol >>> file handling till later :-) >> >> That's really hard to tell with that much noise. That noise also makes >> maintaining the symbol files in future unnecessary hard for my taste. > > Painful, error-prone and superfluous. Shlibs files are enough for the > relatively stable jack API, IMO. probably needless to say, but I agree. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers