On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:35:28AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

If I get no response on this by sunday, and noone else objects, I will go ahead with my proposed plan.

I've tried to follow this as closely as I can, but I am new to packaging so not qualified to discuss the specifics.

However, from what I do understand I do not see a consensus, yet. Also, I would ask that we restate and clarify the proposed scheme and give upstream a chance to comment.

NB: though torben is truly awesome, he is not the only upstream developer.

Thanks for the response. I shall not touch the libjack packaging (even step one that I find glaring and obvious) until others have explicitly requested so and not been disputed by others on this list.

 - Jonas

* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to