On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:06:47PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 02:23:10PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>> As requested by Jonas, here's the RFP.
>> Is there any reason not to begin trying out approaches to supporting
>> switching jack implementations with packages in experimental?
>> I could probably be of more use with something to test than I am by
>> trying to participate in the discussion of what to do when.
> When new packages enter Debian, they get a thorough check by ftpmasters,
> which takes time and consumes resources from the ftpmasters team. So we
> need to be certain of the naming before starting out, to not waste
> resources unnecessarily.
I was aware of the work required for new packages, but somehow failed to
connect it with experimental. Thanks for clarifying.
> I do intend to use experimental if necessary to not disrupt theflow of
> more important packages (read: default JACK implementation) from
> unstable to testing.
Until the naming issues are settled and packages hit experimental, a git
branch could be started couldn't it?
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list