On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7 and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to dpkg-source 3.0 right now. Instead we should switch once the uploader thinks that the tools are ready for 3.0.


Other opinions?

I agree to make source format switch optional for now.

But I propose to also make optional the choice of either CDBS or short-form dh7.

If short-form dh7 becomes mandatory, I will leave the team. This is not meant as a thread (although the net result is somewhat the same), but selfish lazyness: I use CDBS for all 100+ packages that I am involved in maintaining officially for Debian.


Kind regards,

 - Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to