On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:20:46AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 23:01:48 (CEST), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> >> I do intend to use experimental if necessary to not disrupt theflow of
> >> more important packages (read: default JACK implementation) from
> >> unstable to testing.
> > Until the naming issues are settled and packages hit experimental, a git
> > branch could be started couldn't it?
> of course, ftp-masters don't see the package before it has been uploaded ;-)
Even if I've not yet got my head around packaging, I think I can
probably at least handle running git-buildpackage. (/me just looking for
ways to start being more useful).
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list