On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:38:17 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 14:27, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 19:47:47 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI.  Is it
>>> safe to expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its API
>>> (compile time interface) is?
>> Generally speaking, yes.
>> (well, unless there are toolchain changes, etc. - very unlikely at this
>> stage of squeeze)
> Not really. Reordering of enums, for example, could break ABI while
> keeping API compatibility. Same with adding/reordering struct members.
> Not relally common, but can happen.

Oh, you're totally right. Somehow I considered these changes as API
change as well, but what is meant here is a change that does not affect

Other API compatible changes in C++ would e.g. include addition of
additional parameters to existing methods with default parameters. This
would affect ABI as well.

I was clearly confused yesterday, sorry.

Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to