On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:32:04AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 25.04.2010 19:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.No, but IMHO it is easier to read.
I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS. But is that enough reason for making it mandatory for new packages? So the (proposed) plan is to abandon CDBS, but tolerate it temporarily? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers