On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote:
> Hi,
> Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1).
> Upstream has promised a frozen library API[1] equal to that of jackd1
> 0.116.2, and both shlibs file and symbols[2] file reflect that.
> The library packages no longer provide packwards compatibility with
> libjack0.100.0-dev.  The following packages dependend on that and are now
> broken is unstable:

Why? There is no harm in keeping libjack0.100.0-dev.


Felipe Sateler

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to