On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:20:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote:Hi,Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1). Upstream has promised a frozen library API equal to that of jackd1 0.116.2, and both shlibs file and symbols file reflect that. The library packages no longer provide packwards compatibility with libjack0.100.0-dev. The following packages dependend on that and are now broken is unstable:Why? There is no harm in keeping libjack0.100.0-dev.
You are right: I confused ABI with API.I'll add back that virtual package which was apparently dropped accidentally - when posting before I had only discovered and reflected on what to do about it (with wrong outcome - thanks for correcting!).
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers