On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Adrian Knoth
<a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if we're ready to start (or at least prepare) the jackd
> transition today. We've discussed a lot, so am I right to summarize
> the current plan as follows?:
>
>  1.) put jackd1 back in j-a-c-k, IOW, introduce an epoch version number
>  2.) provide a new jackd2 source package
>
> This obviously is a high level view, not talking about all the details
> like dropping symbols file, Provides, Conflicts and the lot.
>
> I think we've already agreed on making libjack0 a non-virtual package
> provided by jackd1 (IOW: j-a-c-k).
>
> If nobody objects, I'll rearrange the git repo today, putting current
> stuff in separate jackd2 branches and revive jackd1. We could then start
> with all the shlibs and debian/control tweaks.
>

+1 from me.

-- 
Alessio Treglia <ales...@alessiotreglia.com>
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to