On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:58:30AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:17:43 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 05:57:48AM +0000, adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:

   Make jackd1 Replace older libjack0 installations.

-Conflicts: libjack0 (<< 1:0.118+svn3796-4),
+Replaces: libjack0 (<< 1:0.118+svn3796-4),

It needs to conflict also: We cannot have multiple packages e.g. provide the conffile.

does libjack0 provide a conffile? I don't think so.

Oh - stupid me.


  * Provides: declare package name

rather: implement the named 'virtual' package

Yeps, that's what I was trying to say too :-)


  * Conflicts: require only one implementation installed at a time
  * Replaces: take over overlapping files (e.g. conffile)

conffile or regular file. in this case: /usr/lib/libjackserver.so.0

...that's at least my understanding of it - I might be wrong about some details or not cover it all: Read the Debian Policy for official info.

I'm pretty confident that Replaces is correct here and conflicts is not necessary.

I do believe they are both needed: I believe that "Replaces" do not magically solve collissions between multiple concurrently installed packages providing same files (conffile or not).


But as I said earlier, I might be wrong.

(I shall try ignore any and all responses to this email now - I made my point already, and should concentrate on my theater work now)


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to