On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:09:24PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> > Huu, this will result in a major usability issue. While it's fine for
> > the buildds to always use jackd1, it's inconvenient for users who want
> > to run jackd2 AND compile some jack apps on their own.
> > If there are better approaches, please let me know.
> How about making jackd2 provide a binary package 'libjack-jackd2-dev'
> that conflicts with libjack-dev?

Sounds good. Will do.


mail: a...@thur.de      http://adi.thur.de      PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to