On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 14:04, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:11:19 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:58, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote:
>>>> ...that's at least my understanding of it - I might be wrong about some
>>>> details or not cover it all: Read the Debian Policy for official info.
>>> I'm pretty confident that Replaces is correct here and conflicts is not
>>> necessary.
>> I'm not sure, but I think this is pretty much the use case scenario for 
>> Breaks
> why does libjack0 need to be deconfigured in this upgrade path?

It doesn't :p. Files have been moved, so a conflicts or breaks is
unnecessary. Sorry for the noise


Felipe Sateler

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to