On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 14:04, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 19:11:19 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:58, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote: >>>> ...that's at least my understanding of it - I might be wrong about some >>>> details or not cover it all: Read the Debian Policy for official info. >>> >>> I'm pretty confident that Replaces is correct here and conflicts is not >>> necessary. >> >> I'm not sure, but I think this is pretty much the use case scenario for >> Breaks > > why does libjack0 need to be deconfigured in this upgrade path?
It doesn't :p. Files have been moved, so a conflicts or breaks is unnecessary. Sorry for the noise -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers