On 01/07/10 11:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:28:28AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:45, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
>>>> From PrefaceCopy.html:
>>>> This version of the Csound Manual ("The Canonical Csound Manual") is
>>>> released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence.
>>> Good.  Let's include that in debian/copyright.
>>> I suspect, however, that "This version of the Csound Manual" does not
>>> cover the complete work.  You mentioned yourself in the earlier
>>> non-DEP5 copyright file that some parts were GPL (or was it LGPL?).
>> Some helper scripts are GPL or LGPL, like the one to convert csd files
>> to docbook xml for inclusion in the manual. The rest is all GFDL.
> Do upstream explicitly state so somehwere (which we can then quote), or
> how do you come to the conclusion that "rest is all GFDL"?

Hmm, I don't think so. However, the tarball contains 2 things. The
manual and helper scripts. The manual is GFDL and the helper scripts
each have an explicit license statement.

Felipe Sateler

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to