On 01/07/10 11:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:28:28AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 02:45, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: >>>> From PrefaceCopy.html: >>>> >>>> This version of the Csound Manual ("The Canonical Csound Manual") is >>>> released under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. >>> >>> Good. Let's include that in debian/copyright. >>> >>> I suspect, however, that "This version of the Csound Manual" does not >>> cover the complete work. You mentioned yourself in the earlier >>> non-DEP5 copyright file that some parts were GPL (or was it LGPL?). >> >> Some helper scripts are GPL or LGPL, like the one to convert csd files >> to docbook xml for inclusion in the manual. The rest is all GFDL. > > Do upstream explicitly state so somehwere (which we can then quote), or > how do you come to the conclusion that "rest is all GFDL"?
Hmm, I don't think so. However, the tarball contains 2 things. The manual and helper scripts. The manual is GFDL and the helper scripts each have an explicit license statement. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers