On 13/08/10 09:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> What obviously helps is documentation.  I never used documentation
> myself for CDBS, just looked at the snippets, and I agree they may look
> scary to someone not intimate in make (similar to autotools being
> disliked by many).

Is there a doxygen-like tool for make? I think it could then be used to
generate reference docs from the sources (which is always easier than
keeping separate documentation).

(I'm thinking this subthread should go to another list...)
Felipe Sateler

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to