On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
>>> wouldn't dare do...
>> While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with
>> either), this statement is not true. debhelper requires dpkg-dev >=
>> 1.14.19, and stable has 1.14.29.
> If limiting to backports targeted stable, I completely agree.
Yes. I don't consider supporting (or taking into account) releases older
than stable worth the time of any developer (except, maybe, during the
few months following a stable release).
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list